Ohio Legislature to Allow Design-Build and Construction Manager at Risk on Public Projects

By: Sean T. Devenney

Ohio recently passed dramatic changes to its public works procurement statute.  In particular, Ohio authorized the utilization of both the design-build and construction manager at risk (CMAR) delivery method for construction projects.   Amazingly, Ohio has gone from only permitting public works project on a multi-prime basis into what appears to be one of the most liberal and progressive public works contracting states in the Country.  http://www.dbia.org/advocacy/ohio110701.htm   It will be interesting to see what, if any, impact the Buckeye State’s decision will have on Indiana.  While Indiana adopted the design-build delivery method in 2005, it has not moved forward on permitting public works projects to utilize the CMAR delivery method.  Perhaps the change of heart in Ohio will serve as a bell weather for similar changes in Indiana to continue the momentum gained through the adoption of the design-build statute.

Additionally, this change in Ohio law opens up another interesting point.  Indiana based CMs and design-builders may now actively seek business opportunities on public projects in Ohio.   Going across state lines for work represents an obvious opportunity to expand business, but it also presents challenges.   For those Indiana based companies considering doing work in the Ohio, they will have to comply with Ohio law, which could differ significantly from Indiana. The public works statute in Ohio serves as a prime example of one of the many legal challenges to doing work in another state.   For instance, the public works statute in Ohio requires the contractor (and its subcontractors) to be enrolled in a drug-free workplace program of the bureau of workers’ compensation for Ohio or a comparable program approved by the bureau.  The drug-free program requires among other things that the contractor have a written drug and alcohol policy and the ability to test employees for drug use.  Additionally, an Indiana contractor must take steps to make sure it has properly registered to do business in Ohio with the Ohio Secretary of State’s office, and must have a valid certificate of compliance issued by the Ohio Equal Opportunity Employer Coordinator certifying that the contractor met its obligations under affirmative action programs authorized under Ohio and/or Federal law.  These are just a few examples of the type of employment-related legal issues that must be dealt with when doing business in another state.

As business opportunities in a down economy become scarce the pressure to expand geographically increases.  However, the decision to enter new markets means the contractor or design professional may be required to meet new and different legal requirements.  This hurdle coupled with the overall general business risks associated with expansion must be carefully considered prior to moving across state lines.

Advertisements

0 Responses to “Ohio Legislature to Allow Design-Build and Construction Manager at Risk on Public Projects”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Daniel M. Drewry

Daniel M. Drewry

Daniel M. Drewry

About This Blog

The DSV Construction Law Blog is hosted by Daniel M. Drewry. Dan is a Partner with the law firm Drewry Simmons Vornehm, LLP and concentrates his practice in the areas of Construction Law and Litigation, and Labor & Employment Law.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 53 other followers


%d bloggers like this: